
Champagne grew to be seen as an affordable luxury, the drink of celebration for the upper and middle classes, thanks to a clever publicity effort. The label is strictly regulated: obviously, only wines form the region, produced according to the traditional méthode champenoise can bear it. Moreover, only nine historical varieties of grapes are allowed for the production, but only three are commonly used: Chardonnay, Pinot Noir and Pinot Meunier.
In the end, it is its bubbles that crown champagne king of festivities. What seems a simple empty sphere in the liquid hides a surprising complexity. Suddenly free from its glass prison, the gas escapes by any air/liquid interface available. At the bottleneck, the adiabatic gas release causes a sudden and noticeable drop of temperature: try noticing the cloud of condensed humidity next time you pop a bottle open. In the liquid’s body, the slightest air pocket can serve as a nucleation site for the CO2 to accumulate. Once a critical amount of CO2 is attained in the pocket, a bubble breaks free and rise to the surface, leaving a vacuum behind that again, quickly get filled, starting a new cycle. If any fibber left from a dishcloth, any dust spec in the glass can serve as a nucleation site, some glass manufacturers engrave a pattern at the bottom of the flute to enhance the production of bubbles.

Born on a spec or in an engraving, the bubbles begin their lives of travel. Their mass movement creates an important convection effect in the glass. How the liquid is mixed by its bubble depends in the end of the glass’ shape. Flutes are more thoroughly agitated than coupes, affecting the outgassing process and creating different convection fluxes of the aromas. Bubbles can thus cause different “taste profiles” of a champagne served in different glass shapes. As it rises on its life’s journey, the bubble keeps growing. Given a champagne of typical density, the ideal gas constant, an average temperature of service of champagne and the expected pressure inside the bubble, a champagne bubble will expand at a rate of 430 mm/s (comparatively to 150 mm/s for a beer bubble). Some chemists specialized in champagne physic-chemistry – yes, such people exist – the final average size of a champagne bubble is expressed as
R ≈ 2.7 · 10-3 · q5/9 · (1/(r · g))2/9 · (((cL – kH) · P0)/P0)1/3 · h1/3

After their birth at the frontier of water and air and their journey through an amber world the bubbles arrive at their cemetery: the surface. A bubble will survive for a time assembled in rafts of up to six members, expanding slowly to an approximate critical radius of 100 nm, surviving then for a time varying between 10 and 100 ms. The life of a bubble might be short, but they go with a swan song. As they burst out of existence, their envelope of liquid is projected in the air. This envelope was enriched in surfactant molecule. The aerosols over the glass are thus enriched as well. It has been shown by mass spectrometry of champagne’s headspace contains ethyl esters of fatty acid such a myristoleic, palmitoleic, and oleic acids, that not only contributes to the aroma of a wine but also to its foaming capacity. Notably, the decanoic and dodecanoic acid esters can be enriched, giving respectively toasty and dry aromas. Higher concentrations of norisoprenoids have also been noted in the aerosols, these being responsible of notable fruity aromas. Bubbles are thus not only part of the ‘tactile’ experience of champagne, nor simple mixing agents, they create an entire experience for the taster before the liquid even touches its lips.
Beware of the consequence of champagne though: some lightweights say that sparkling wines make then tipsy faster: the CO2 somehow enhancing the effect of ethanol. Although a study attempted to address the question (Roberts, 2007), the jury is still out. The presence of CO2 in the ethanol solutions only amplified individual variations in alcohol absorption. But driven by the hypothetical synergy of CO2 and C2H5OH or not, be careful when you pop open the bottle. As A Galloway notes in an article in the Lancet. “Champagne-cork injury to the eye” (yes, that is the actual title), the cork can easily attain speeds of 15 m/s, reaching the eye in a hundred us (an average blink takes 300-400 us). Another article (“Bottle cork injury and cap injury to the eye”) underlines in the most serious tone that “Bottle cork injury of the eye can cause severe damage to the globe with secondary loss of visual function that can be permanent as we observed in the literature and in the series we report. The dangerous effect of pressurized fluid, even under normal circumstances, is well known, as shown in various studies.”
Further reading :
Gallart M. Lopez-Tamanes E. Suberbiola G. Buxaderas S. 2002, Influence of Fatty Acids on Wine Foaming, J. Agric. Food Chem., 50, 7042-5
Liger-Belair G. Cilindrea C. Gougeon R. Lucioc M. Gebefu I. Jeandet P. Schmitt-Kopplinc P. 2009, Unraveling different chemical fingerprints between a champagne wine and its aerosols, Proc. Natl. Aca. Sci. 106 (39), 16545–9
Roberts C. Robinson S.P. 2007, Alcohol concentration and carbonation of drinks: The Effect On Blood Alcohol Levels, J. Forens. Leg. Med., 14, 398–405